Political Science, asked by jahnvi15, 9 months ago

State two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India.

Answers

Answered by Anonymous

$\huge{\underline{\mathscr{\purple{Hey,mate..!}}}}$

$\huge{\red{\mathfrak{Answer}}}$

$<a><b><i><body bgcolor="pink">$

❤️_________✍️_________❤️

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India on several grounds, two of which are stated below:

⭕⭕⭕⭕⭕⭕⭕

(i) The colonial rule was arbitrary. The British passed the Sedition Act in 1870. Under this Act any person protesting or criticising the British government could be arrested without trial.

❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

(ii) The Indian nationalists played a prominent role in development of the legal sphere in British India.

✔️✌️✔️✌️✔️✌️✔️✌️✔️✌️✔️

$<marquee >$

‌

‌ $\large{\red{\boxed{\mathbb{Hope\: It\: Helps}}}}$

❤️

✨✨

✳️✳️✳️

✔️✔️✔️✔️

➖➖➖➖➖

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️

✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️✳️

✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

Answered by Anonymous

Answer:

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British India.

Previous Question

Next Question

State two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India.​

Answers

State two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India.