Question

state two reasons why historians refute the claim that the british introduced the rule of law in india .​

Answer 1

Answer:

$\huge{\underline{\underline{\bold{\fcolorbox{blue}{pink}{Answer}}}}}$

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the.

Answer 2

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British India.

$\huge\pink{\mid{\fbox{\tt{CottonCandy}}\mid}}$