Question

state two reasons why historians refute the claim that the british introduced the rule of law in india

Answer 1

Answer:

British rule in India does not imply the rule of law in India. Historians have presented enough evidence to prove this. While at home the principle of rule of law was fairly implied, in colonial India the rules were always modified and controlled for profit motives. Racial superiority was seen in administration. Secondly, Indian intelligentsia was working to expose these policies and demanded greater participation in government so that the rulemaking process acknowledge Indian demands.

Answer 2

Answer:

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British india