Question

state two reasons why historians refute the claim thet the British introduce the rule of law in india​

Answer 1

Answer:

Mark me Birrlient

Explanation:

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British India. ... Domestic violence against women was very common in India in the early 1990s. Moreover, the laws for Europeans and Indians were different. The british were often not punished for the crimes committed against Indians.

Answer 2

Answer:

Historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India because colonial law was arbitrary, and the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the development of the legal sphere in British India.

Keep smiling ☺️