Question

style of writing history determined by___?​

Answer 1

$\underline{\boxed{\tt{\huge{\red{AnSwEr}}}}}$

The historian must treat sources with appropriate reservations.

$<marquee scrollamount = 1500> ⚡ Rishik here ⚡$

Answer 2

Answer:

The historian must treat sources with appropriate reservations;The historian must not dismiss counter evidence without scholarly consideration;The historian must be even-handed in treatment of evidence and eschew "cherry-picking";The historian must clearly indicate any speculation.

Explanation:

Historical writing must be analytic, and go beyond easy description. Historical analysis investigates relationships and distinctions which are not instantly apparent. Good historians carefully gauge and construe their sources; they relate causes and effects; they give importance to ideas, actors, and events; and they weigh challenging elucidations for all of these.

History as a subject is deeply ingrained in discovering and utilising evidence to back one’s arguments. Historical writing necessitates a mixture of focus and awareness of structural considerations together with the discovery and evaluation of facts.

Thus, it is not enough to write well stylistically and grammatically. A historian should answer numerous questions in his/her writing. These questions are not restricted merely to what ensued; they comprise why and in what way.

The historian should address the event’s background, the principals contained, important dates, and the impact of the event on impending developments. This mixture of structure and comprehensive factual examination makes historical writing challenging for beginners as well as skilled writers .