History, asked by sakshi4278, 11 months ago

subsidiary Alliance was advantages to the British bus but it is disa
dvantages for the Indian nawabs explain ​

Answers

Answered by raj621392
3

Answer:

it means that subsidiary alliance we a advantage for british bus but disadvantage for India nawab

Answered by Raviditya
4

Question :

The Question is that :-

How was the subsidiary alliance was proved advantageous to the British and proved disadvantageous for the Indian rulers/nawabs?

Answer:

The Subsidiary Alliance proved very advantageous for the British: the British maintained large army at the expense of Indian rulers. They acquired valuable territories as a subsidiary payment. this led to the expansion of British Empire in India and an increase in its resources.

The Subsidiary Alliance proved very advantageous for the British: the British maintained large army at the expense of Indian rulers. They acquired valuable territories as a subsidiary payment. this led to the expansion of British Empire in India and an increase in its resources.

The Subsidiary Alliance proved very advantageous for the British: the British maintained large army at the expense of Indian rulers. They acquired valuable territories as a subsidiary payment. this led to the expansion of British Empire in India and an increase in its resources. On the other hand, Subsidiary Alliance proved very disadvantageous for the Indian rulers: under this system,the rulers had to let go of their Independence and had to accept suzerainty of the English East India company. as a result of payment of subsidies, the Indian states became gradually poor.

Similar questions