Summary of THE DEAD MAN WHO WORE PAJAMAS PART 1
Answers
Answer
SUMMARY:
I read a bit of news on the Internet that a man was discovered dead in Tokyo on 10 June 2004, wearing his night wear. The news goes on: when he passed on, he was in his room. Along these lines, the clinic theory is out and we are left with just the possibility that he died in his sleep
Be that as it may, there is as yet another probability: assault followed by death.
The individuals who have visited Tokyo realize that the enormous city is in the meantime one of the most secure places on the planet. I recollect once halting to eat with my editors before traveling to the inside of Japan – every one of our bags were in sight on the back seat of the vehicle. Quickly I said that it was extremely hazardous, somebody was certain to gone along, see each one of those packs and snatch our garments, reports, etc. My proofreader just grinned and let me know not to stress – he knew about no such occurrence in throughout the entire his long stretches of life.
Be that as it may, to come back to our dead man in pajamas: there was no indication of battle, viciousness or anything of the sort. In a meeting, a Metropolitan Police officer expressed that it was in all likelihood an instance of an abrupt heart assault. So the theory of crime was additionally wiped out.
The body had been found by laborers of a development organization on the second floor of a structure in a lodging complex that was going to be torn down.
Furthermore, presently for the grievous piece of the story: our dead man was just a skeleton wearing night wear. Next to him was an open paper dated 20 February 1984; a timetable on the table adjacent gave a similar date.
At the end of the day, he had been there for a long time.
Answer:
In the story, the writer Paulo Coelho seems to suggest that the dead man may either have met his death naturally or that he may have been killed. But then the incident happens in Tokyo that is one of the safest places on the planet. Hence, that theory seems to have disappeared soon.
However, since the person was poor and he did not have the money, that may have been the reason for his death. And yes, most importantly, it was the skeleton of the man who had died about 20 years back.