Question

: Suppose you receive two one ruoee couns;

one from the 1970s and the other that is

currently in circulation. Will it be useful to

study history? If yes, then how?​

Answer 1

Answer: yes

Explanation:

a 2 rupee coin from the 70s might look relatively different than a coin curently in circulation.it is useful to study the history as we can study & see the changes in both the coins despite them both being of 2 Rs. its also shows he quality of work in a span of 50 years

hope this helps! please mark this as brainliest!

Answer 2

Answer:

The coin of the year 1970 and the one which is currently in circulation can be useful from the point view of studying history. The metal used for minting the coin. its shape & size, its weight, the patterns or letters engraved on it are helpful in this study.

• The coin for year 1970 is minted from nickel, whereas the current coin is minted from Ferritic Stainless Steel (FSS).
• The earlier coin is heavier than the current one.
• Though both coins are circular in shape, the size of the old coin is larger than the current coin.
• The coin of 1970s has the pattern of corn engraved on it which indicates that our economy was primarily agrarian economy in that era & the symbol of 'green revolution".
• Also both the coins have the name of the country (India) & its national emblem engraved on it.
• The coin of 1970 has the word RUPEE mentioned on it, whereas in the new coin the sign is engraved.

All these observations help us in analysing and understanding the economic changes that have taken place in India such as its shifting from agrarian economy, the development of the sign, the changes in the metal, size & weight of the coin etc.