"Tabon Man" which are the primary source and the secondary source between the two readings
Answers
Answer:
The primary source between the two readings would be the one written by Robert B. Fox, and the secondary source would be the one written by William Henry Scott. Between the two readings, the major source would be the one written by Robert B. Fox, while the secondary source would be the one written by William Henry Scott. Because of the time difference between the two readings, it's clear that Fox wrote first, followed by Scott. Robert described the findings in detail, highlighting his own precise observations. He also added that the excavation months and year, as well as the readings, are exclusively focused on the traits and significance of the "tabon man" that they have discovered. Robert appears to be writing in his own journal on events that he experienced firsthand. The secondary source is the one written by William Henry Scott, which contains reviews and comments on the discovery of the 'tabon man.' He also presented a scenario and his thoughts on how a decently clad 'tabon guy' would appear. His publications appear to be more useful because he included anthropologists' facts and discoveries but did not properly cite them. It appeared to be more of an interpretation and analysis of all of the facts and findings he had acquired on the subject.
Explanation:
The primary source and the secondary source between the two readings are;
Between the two readings, the one written by Robert B. Fox is the primary source, while the one written by William Henry Scott is the secondary source. The main source is the one written by Robert B. Fox, while the secondary source is by William Henry Scott. Because of the time difference between the two readings, it's clear that Fox wrote first and Scott second. Robert discussed the data in great detail, highlighting his precise observations. He also added that the months and years of excavation, as well as the readings, are completely focused on the traits and significance of the "taboon man" they have discovered. Robert appears to be writing in his notebook on incidents he witnessed firsthand. The secondary source is William Henry Scott's book, which provides reviews and comments on the finding of the 'taboon man.' He also gave a scenario and his opinions on how a nicely dressed 'tab on guy' might seem. His articles appear to be more valuable since he used facts and findings made by anthropologists but did not properly acknowledge them. It looked to be more of a synthesis and study of all of the data and findings he had gathered on the issue.