test the value of the following arguments :if I study ,I will not fail in the examination If I don't watch TV in the evening, I will study I failed in the examination.therefore, I must have watched TV in the evening
Answers
Step-by-step explanation:
This argument is absulately right.Because if you attain good result you need more and more study.
Answer:
The argument presented is invalid as there are several possible reasons why the individual failed the examina-tion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conclusion drawn that the individual must have watched TV in the evening is a hasty generalization, without considering other possible factors that could have contributed to their failure.
The first premise states that if the individual studies, they will not fail in the examination. This is a conditional statement, implying that studying is a necessary condit ion for not failing. The second premise states that if the individual does not watch TV in the evening, they will study. This premise implies that not watching TV in the evening is a necessary condition for studying. However, it does not necessarily imply that studying will lead to passing the examination.
The conclusion drawn from these premises that the individual must have watched TV in the evening because they failed the examination is flawed. It ignores the possibility that the individual may have studied but still failed due to other factors such as poor test-taking skills, lack of preparation, or difficult exam questions. Moreover, the argument assumes that watching TV in the evening is the only reason the individual could have failed the exam, which is not necessarily true.
In conclusion, the argument presented is invalid as it relies on a hasty generalization and ignores other possible factors that could have contributed to the individual's failure in the examination. It is essential to consider all possible variables and not jump to conclusions without sufficient evidence or reasoning.
For more such question: https://brainly.in/question/19927607
#SPJ2