Art, asked by tanvi1226, 1 year ago


how \: \: did \:  \: the \:  \: indian \:  \:  \\ painters \: and \: sculptors  \\  contribute \:  \: to \:  \: the \:  \: national \\ freedom \:  \: movemnt \:
?????

describe  \:  \: in \:  \: detail \:  \:with \:  \\ appropriate \:  \: examples
if someone knw the right ans then answer otherwise leave it..
♡♡i will be thankful if you answer♡


Jiyakhera: i am unaware with the deatils so..i am not answering but heres what I know - Their work encouraged the people.. the painters made the painting of bharat mata been tortured or paintings of Britishers beating Indians...or their cruel behaviour...that would lit a fire in indians against Britishers !!☺☺
tanvi1226: Thnks to be honest and giving your own answer.

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
3
A previous question asked 'Which dialects of English consider “would” to be a polite form of “will”?' I'd say it's a virtually universal pragmatic device to use 'would' where 'will' would appear the logical choice (though there are probably some situations where using it might be confusing).

Here, 'I will ...' might sound too presumptuous for some, getting too close to assuming compliance. But I'd say that it's a matter of pragmatics rather than grammar (ie don't worry about breaking 'rules' that might have been suggested in some 50-year-old book).

Where there is no sense in hedging, 'will' is quite acceptable, but doesn't pair with 'could':

'I will be really grateful if Limeside Council answers.'

Rob De Decker, at Grammar.ccc.comm, agrees that politeness-marking can trump expected usage here, though he says that 'will' can also function as a politeness marker [where volition rather than mere future possibility is obviously implied]:

The conditional construction does n


tanvi1226: what's this
Answered by Shankyy
1

How did the Indian painters and sculptors contribute to the nation's freedom movement?

Rather than long speeches the people will be more convinced about a matter ,if they see a painting.


The contribution of the Sculptors and Painters are of 3 ways.


1.They prevented over western intrusion in arts and preserved Indian culture. Such a swadheshi alternative influenced people psychologically People understood that cultural and artistic hegemony is as equal as economic hegemony.


Resistance through such cultural alternatives beacame a headache to Britishers who was trying to inject their culture to form a class of people supporting them.


This resistance later contributed in intensifying nationalism.


2.Artists like Tagore who was world known bridged together western and indian style. This invited the attention of artists around the world and they came to know about the plight of Indians..


3.There was a gap existed between the learned upper class and uneducated lower class. Patriotic songs , paintings sculptures bridged the both classes.


The paintings of Abhiandra Nath Tagore , Nandalal Bose depicted the plight of Indians.The paintings depicted the hardships of people of one part of the country and was shown to the other parts.This made people consider and care for their brothers and the various ends. Problems of the people of one part was taken as “ours “ by the other part.


No one can ever deny the role the painters and sculptors played in Indian struggle for independence.



hope this will help you .


mark me as brainliest if u like.

Similar questions