Question

${\tt{\green{\underline{\underline{\huge{Question}}}}}}$${\tt{\red{\underline{\underline{\huge{DON'T SPAMM:}}}}}}$
Why is time frozen from light's perspective?
✳️ copy paste answer ignored..​

Answer 1

Explanation:

Time is not frozen from light's perspective, because light does not have a perspective. There is no valid reference frame in which light is at rest. This statement is not a minor issue that can be approximated away or overcome by a different choice of words.

Answer 2

$answer$

Explanation:

Time is not frozen from lights perspective because light does not have a perspective.

Time is not frozen from lights perspective because light does not have a perspective.People say that because they have misunderstood the singularity in the time dilation equation.

Time is not frozen from lights perspective because light does not have a perspective.People say that because they have misunderstood the singularity in the time dilation equation.At exactly lightspeed, the time dilation factor is undefined. We say there is a singularity there: it is a “singular” speed.

Time is not frozen from lights perspective because light does not have a perspective.People say that because they have misunderstood the singularity in the time dilation equation.At exactly lightspeed, the time dilation factor is undefined. We say there is a singularity there: it is a “singular” speed.Approaching lightspeed, the factor diverges.. that is, it gets very big: arbitrarily big.

Time is not frozen from lights perspective because light does not have a perspective.People say that because they have misunderstood the singularity in the time dilation equation.At exactly lightspeed, the time dilation factor is undefined. We say there is a singularity there: it is a “singular” speed.Approaching lightspeed, the factor diverges.. that is, it gets very big: arbitrarily big.This means that clocks with a relative speed very close to lightspeed can be ticking so slowly that they have effectively stopped. Giving an impression of frozen time see?

Time is not frozen from lights perspective because light does not have a perspective.People say that because they have misunderstood the singularity in the time dilation equation.At exactly lightspeed, the time dilation factor is undefined. We say there is a singularity there: it is a “singular” speed.Approaching lightspeed, the factor diverges.. that is, it gets very big: arbitrarily big.This means that clocks with a relative speed very close to lightspeed can be ticking so slowly that they have effectively stopped. Giving an impression of frozen time see?However, the near-lightspeed observer will personally experience the normal passage of time. So time is not frozen for the observer. This is because motion is relative, and the passage of time is relative. You are always stationary in your own reference frame.

Time is not frozen from lights perspective because light does not have a perspective.People say that because they have misunderstood the singularity in the time dilation equation.At exactly lightspeed, the time dilation factor is undefined. We say there is a singularity there: it is a “singular” speed.Approaching lightspeed, the factor diverges.. that is, it gets very big: arbitrarily big.This means that clocks with a relative speed very close to lightspeed can be ticking so slowly that they have effectively stopped. Giving an impression of frozen time see?However, the near-lightspeed observer will personally experience the normal passage of time. So time is not frozen for the observer. This is because motion is relative, and the passage of time is relative. You are always stationary in your own reference frame.Light itself cannot be an observer, by definition. That would be a logical contradiction.

Time is not frozen from lights perspective because light does not have a perspective.People say that because they have misunderstood the singularity in the time dilation equation.At exactly lightspeed, the time dilation factor is undefined. We say there is a singularity there: it is a “singular” speed.Approaching lightspeed, the factor diverges.. that is, it gets very big: arbitrarily big.This means that clocks with a relative speed very close to lightspeed can be ticking so slowly that they have effectively stopped. Giving an impression of frozen time see?However, the near-lightspeed observer will personally experience the normal passage of time. So time is not frozen for the observer. This is because motion is relative, and the passage of time is relative. You are always stationary in your own reference frame.Light itself cannot be an observer, by definition. That would be a logical contradiction.For instance, if light could be an observer, then there would be a reference frame that light is stationary in. However, special relativity is based on the postulate, the logical presupposition, that there is no such reference frame. Light cannot be stationary. Thus there can be no observer with the same speed as light and light itself cannot be an observer