Question

The ability to speak does not make you intelligent essay

Answer 1

Change is for better and is necessary too. Everyone knows it but only the ones who apply it are the ones whom we call as intelligent. When a person changes in an order to make his life better, he chooses the right thing because staying put at a place in life doesn't take anyone anywhere.

Taking the example of a few infamous personalities, whom we consider as intelligent, we see a common thing that each one of them had a certain vision in life and in order to achieve it, they were ready to accept any kind of change and still are. So, this makes it clear that change is what leads us to our goal and in order to achieve it, we need to change with time.

Answer 2

The ability to speak does not make you intelligent essay

Explanation:

• As a species, speech is definitely an intelligence marker which distinguishes people from other species. It seems that we have the most complex, nuanced and precise communication method ever for any species.  Here's a little difference in speech ability. It's not that it's not a sign of understanding to be able to talk well. It's not the only indication, it's not perfect.
• An individual who has practiced and/or interacted more intensively for a longer period of time would certainly be better than a person who has little communication experience. Greater communication skills display more variables, like experience and preparation, than pure knowledge.
• A person who thinks very normally can certainly better communicate than an individual who has a less common method of thinking. Qualitative variations in perception apart, quantifiable variations in complexity and thought speed can have a significant impact on communication. You can be too knowledgeable for people to interact effectively.
• If people can not remain mentally with you, they will probably not be able to live up to your communication style and to follow your logic internally. Indeed, you might say that the nearer a person is the closer they are to average, the better they are in communication because they have a wider variety of people who could understand them.
• Speaking as an intelligence test completely discount  the autism spectrum of people, people who can not talk for various reasons etc. In the past, many scientists and artists have been incredibly bad in communication and have significantly contributed to the intellectual growth of the world among them Isaac Newton. This is definitely not an objective criterion for assessing an individual's ability to think critically.
• Take the time to always think before you talk. A wise man can speak only if he needs to. A naive person can blurt something without thought, if it's worth talking about it. Ultimately, using an individual's ability to speak/communicate effectively is not an objective or comprehensive measure of intelligence,