Social Sciences, asked by lavanyadevi24598, 11 months ago

the armour of the isolated self sufficient village was pierced by the steel rail and it's life blood ebbed away


what is the exact meaning of this​

Answers

Answered by vansharya1010
8

Answer: There was a sudden and quick collapse of the urban handicrafts industry which had for centuries made India’s name a byword in the markets of the entire civilized world. This collapse was caused largely by competition with the cheaper imported machine made goods from Britain.

We know the British imposed a policy of one­ way free trade on India after 1813 and the invasion of British manufactures, in particular cotton textiles, immediately followed. Indian goods made with primitive techniques could not compete with goods produced on a mass scale by powerful steam-operated machines.

The ruin of Indian industries, particularly rural artisan industries, proceeded even more rapidly once the railways were built. The railways enabled British manufactures to reach and uproot the traditional industries in the remotest villages of the country. As the American writer, D.H. Buchanan, has put it, “The armour of the isolated self-sufficient village was pierced by the steel rail, and its life blood ebbed away.”

The cotton-weaving and spinning industries were the worst hit. Silk and woolen textiles fared no better and a similar fate overtook the iron, pottery, glass, paper, metals, guns, shipping, oil-pressing, tanning and dyeing industries.

Apart from the influx of foreign goods, some other factors arising from British conquest also contributed to the ruin of Indian industries. The oppression practiced by the East India Company and its servants on the craftsmen of Bengal during the second half of the eighteenth century, forcing them to sell their goods below the market price and to hire their services below the prevailing wage, compelled a large number of them to abandon their ancestral professions. In the normal course, Indian handicrafts would have benefited from the encouragement given by the Company to their export, but this oppression had an opposite effect.

The high import duties and other restrictions imposed on the import of Indian goods into Britain and Europe during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, combined with the development of modern manufacturing industries in Britain led to the virtual closing of European markets to Indian manufacturers after 1820.

PLEASE MARK ME AS A BRAINLIST !!!

:)

Answered by vijaylexi1
0

American writer D. H. Buchanan has said, "The armor of the isolated self-sufficient village was pierced by the steel rail, and its lifeblood ebbed away.", for the rapid transformation of India's economy led by Britishers.

Explanation:

  • The policy of Britishers rapidly transformed India's economy into a colonial economy.
  • Its nature and structure were determined by the needs of the British.
  • The rail policy of the British government discriminated against Indian enterprises.
  • British imports were given a special privilege.
  • The drain of wealth to British, the decay of indigenous industries, economic exploitation, a backward agricultural structure led to the exploitation of the poor peasants.
  • Charles Elliott said, "I do not hesitate to say that half the agricultural population do not know from one yearns end to another what it is to have a full meal."

#SPJ2

Similar questions