the assertion of the truth
is the aim of
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
This suggests that both aims and rules can ground criticisms and challenges. If these observations are correct, there are two ways to account for IMPROPER FALSITY: a factive explanation (truth is the rule of assertion), and an explanation that is compatible with non- factive accounts (truth is the aim of assertion).
Explanation:
hope it helps you
mark me brainliest
Answered by
0
This suggests that both aims and rules can ground criticisms and challenges. If these observations are correct, there are two ways to account for IMPROPER FALSITY: a factive explanation (truth is the rule of assertion), and an explanation that is compatible with non- factive accounts (truth is the aim of assertion)
Similar questions