Social Sciences, asked by gitakumari12, 11 months ago

the british administration posed a deep threat for the flourishing economy of Bengal..... explain

please answer me fast I will mark you as brainliest please please please please please please ​

Answers

Answered by NavinChinnasamy
7

Answer:

The basic fact is that the same social, political and economic processes that produced industrial development and social and cultural progress in Britain also produced and then maintained economic underdevelopment and social and cultural backwardness in India.

Explanation:

The reason for this is Obvious. Britain subordinated the Indian economy to its own economy and determined the basic social trends in India according to their own needs.

It is interesting to note that the dates of the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in Britain and the British conquest of Bengal virtually coincide!

Answered by 5queen36
3

\boxed{\red{!\:Answer\:!}}

  • Socially and culturally, India would have been as coherent as in the British storyline.
  • Nothing except Islam has ever significantly disturbed the social organization of India.
  • The fact that the Mughal empire was coming off its apogee at the time the British came on the scene suggests that the political organization would have been heading downhill towards fragmentation, with or without the British.
  • India fell into the hands of the British after the three Anglo-Maratha wars.
  • Tilak and Gandhi derived their Hind Swarajya from this very term. So, India had been united in its current form before the British.
Similar questions