Social Sciences, asked by shwetaamitrathi, 2 days ago

'The British took advantage of the lack of unity among the Indians'. Justify the given
statement. What if all the Indians were unity against the British? Give one benefit.​

Answers

Answered by llMadeSavagell
1

{\huge{\underline{\small{\mathbb{\pink{♡Ans:-}}}}}}

Britain's commercial interests turned into political ones. in the early 1600s, British East India Company won trading rights on the fringe of the Mughal Empire. ... As the Mughal power crumbled, India became fragmented and people with different languages and traditions were not able to unite against invaders.

Answered by parthjain12
0

Answer:

British raj, period of direct British rule over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 until the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947. The raj succeeded management of the subcontinent by the British East India Company, after general distrust and dissatisfaction with company leadership resulted in a widespread mutiny of sepoy troops in 1857, causing the British to reconsider the structure of governance in India. The British government took possession of the company’s assets and imposed direct rule. The raj was intended to increase Indian participation in governance, but the powerlessness of Indians to determine their own future without the consent of the British led to an increasingly adamant national independence movement.

Similar questions