“The Civil Disobedience Movement was different from the Non-
Cooperation Movement.” Support the statement with examples.
Answers
Answer:
1. The main objective of the non-cooperation movement was 'not to co-operate with the British' but the civil disobedience movement not only called for non-cooperation but breaking of various colonial laws.
2. During the non-cooperation movement, for example, students left government controlled schools and colleges, headmasters and teachers resigned, and lawyers gave up their legal practices. In contrast, people in large no. broke the salt law by manufacturing salt from seawater during the civil disobedience movement.
3. The non-cooperation movement saw the boycott of all kinds of foreign goods and foreign cloth and the simultaneous promotion of khadi cloth. But the civil disobedience not only boycotted foreign goods but also called for a complete boycott of British institutions and the British systems of governance. For example - many people broke the forest laws and entered the restricted areas, people refused to pay any kind of taxes to the government.
Answer:
here is your answer
please do support me
Explanation:
Non- Cooperation Movement Civil Disobedience Movement It was launched in 1920s.
It was launched in 1930s.The Non-Cooperation Movement sought to bring the working of the government to a standstill by not cooperating with the administration.The Civil Disobedience Movement was an attempt at paralysing the administration by breaking some specific rules & regulations.There were no tax campaigns in this movement.
It involved non- payment of taxes & land-revenue as well as violation of laws.
Many leaders renounced their titles & left their government jobs.
It involved defiance of salt laws, boycott of liquor, foreign cloth & British goods of all kinds.It was not violent until the Chauri Chaura incident took place.The movement became violent in a matter of time.