Question

The concept of “Democracy” and “Good Governance” are conflated in terms of achieving welfare of the
common people. How far do you agree with the statement? Give arguments and examples in support of your
statement from across the globe. (150 words)
The person to answer gets the brainilest answer from me
And pls complete till the word limit

Answer 1

Yes, The concept of democracy and the good governance are conflated in many ways.

Explanation:

In literature, the concept of democracy and good governance has become conflated.

The concept has become conflated because it was based on the providence of better lifestyle and opportunities to the people of a country.

But this concept failed to alleviate poverty, generate growth, and also to bring the effective methods of democracy for the people.

To bring peace and security is also the failure os this concept in many countries such as Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.

Answer 2

Answer:

Yes, The concept of democracy and the good governance are conflated in many ways.

• In literature, the concept of democracy and good governance has become conflated.
• The concept has become conflated because it was based on the providence of better lifestyle and opportunities to the people of a country.
• But this concept failed to alleviate poverty, generate growth, and also to bring the effective methods of democracy for the people.
• To bring peace and security is also the failure or this concept in many countries such as Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.This oft-quoted aphorism of Pope underlines a fundamental tension between “democracy” and “good governance,” although the underlying concepts are often conflated in the literature analyzing “developing” nations. Constitution of these concepts, however, often relies on such different sets of indicators that it becomes difficult to ascertain whether they are related to any significant degree. One of the most commonly accepted definitions of “democracy” (that of Robert Dahl) relies on procedural indicators of electoral democracy: universal suffrage, elections registering voter preferences faithfully, unbiased choice among alternatives, and these choices or preferences become the basis for constituting holders of public office (Dahl, 1989), without reference to whether the government that is produced is “good governance.” Nor do discussions of “good governance” usually mention elections, whether democratic or otherwise. In fact, because the two concepts rely on very different criteria, it is not clear that, in the discourse, “good governance” includes “democracy.” Clearly, “democracy” alone is not a sufficient cause of “good governance.”

Explanation:

PLZZ MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST ANSWER