the Constitution of India came into force from sixty five years ago.But we could not have the desired results.whom should we attribute our failling to.a) communalism or b) narrowly self interested behavior of many of the MPs, MLAs, Ministers and officials at the top.or c)a lack of good work culture?give one reason for your answer?
Answers
Answer:
b narrowly self interested behavior of many mps ans mlas
Answer: C this is optional all the answers are correct in thier own way
Explanation:
Several families migrate to a large city in the Western world. Hassan and Nadia come from Kurdistan and object to their daughter taking part in coeducational swimming lessons. Krish and Shanti resided in a Caribbean nation where children are subjected to frequent disciplinary spanking on the buttocks. Gideon and Yael are Jews from Israel. They circumcised their son and give him a small glass of wine at Sabbath dinner. All of these cultures and/or religion-based practices may impact on the health of the children involved, but all are treated with varying degrees of acceptance in various Western nations.
There may be tension between secular governments and minority cultural and religious groups regarding certain practices, especially those that potentially threaten the health of children. The sorts of decisions that can cause conflicts between a secular state and a religious family may involve issues other than health. Education, disciplinary practices, and even baby naming may be issues. Furthermore, religious views may be idiosyncratic, without linkage to a recognizable religious group. The focus of this essay, however, will be restricted to practices of minority religious groups that threaten the health or safety of children. While the ethical discussion at the heart of many of these practices is similar (namely, balancing religious prerogatives with a societal duty to the welfare of children), policy and legal treatment has varied. A fair and predictable rubric for addressing such practices is necessary.
In this essay we consider the issues at stake in balancing parents’ right to raise children according to their religious tradition against the state’s obligation to protect children and present a rubric to consistently and fairly balance these interests. Problematic parental decisions based on religion are frequent. They present particular difficulty because of the intrinsically powerful influence of religion. Theoretical approaches to resolving these disputes range from viewing parents as mere stewards of their children on behalf of the state to great deference to parental decisions, especially those grounded in minority cultural influences . We propose a test that can be applied in the context of both law and the practice of clinical ethics to resolve these problems individually or collectively. Our position prioritizes the needs and interests of the child, while also respecting those of society and the family.
Explanation: