The decision to visit planets other than Earth is not supported by everyone. What would be a good argument against sending humans to other planets?
Answers
It is projected that sending people to Mars would cost billions of dollars (at the low end), and the added difficulty of living astronauts would generate a lot of room for failure.
Pace-flight is highly dangerous, for astronauts as well as for robots. Thirty-three per cent of all people who went into space died doing so. In contrast, just 0.07 per cent of aircraft pilots and 0.016 per cent of U.S. police would die on the job.
The space atmosphere is lethal without proper protection: the main danger in the space vacuum comes from the lack of oxygen and heat, while temperature and radiation often pose risks. The effects of exposure to space will lead to sickness of ebullism , hypoxia, hypochondria and decompression.
It had never been meant to be easy to place humans on the Moon. It was an incredible long-shot, and one that paid off in practice. The catch, right? It needed a lot of coordinated effort, and it cost a lot of money.
Answer:
We should not send human to other planets because it needs a lot of money to prepare for the trip. We also don't know wat will happen to people wo go there. They might not survive in other planets, since they might not have the right tools to help them survive. So, I suggest to not send humans to other planets.
Please mark as brainliest!