Question

The democratic government is important for the all round developement. Explain....

I will mark brainliest​

Answer 1

$\huge\bf\underline{\underline{\pink{❄A} \orange{N}\blue{S}\red{W}\green{E}\purple{R❄}}}</p><p>$

The relation between democracy and development could be considered one of controversial topics in contemporary political debate. What makes it controversial are the inconclusive results, particularly about the causal relation between the two. Some findings argue that the level of development is likely to promote democracy while others show differently. Przeworski et al. (2000), Ming-Chang Tsai (2006), Robinson (2006), and Mainwaring and Perez-Linan (2003) are among those who acknowledge the positive relationship between democracy and development. This claim is highly reasonable if we consider that several developed countries e.g. the US and the UK are politically still democratic for a long period of time. However, countries such as South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore exhibit different cases. They keep experiencing economic growth but are considered to have less political democracy (Bagchi, 1995). This seems similar with Durham’s argument (1999) and Roemer (1995) who point out that authoritarianism is more favorable for development than democracy.

Answer 2

\huge\bf\underline{\underline{\pink{❄A} \orange{N}\blue{S}\red{W}\green{E}\purple{R❄}}} < /p > < p >

❄ANSWER❄

</p><p>

The relation between democracy and development could be considered one of controversial topics in contemporary political debate. What makes it controversial are the inconclusive results, particularly about the causal relation between the two. Some findings argue that the level of development is likely to promote democracy while others show differently. Przeworski et al. (2000), Ming-Chang Tsai (2006), Robinson (2006), and Mainwaring and Perez-Linan (2003) are among those who acknowledge the positive relationship between democracy and development. This claim is highly reasonable if we consider that several developed countries e.g. the US and the UK are politically still democratic for a long period of time. However, countries such as South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore exhibit different cases. They keep experiencing economic growth but are considered to have less political democracy (Bagchi, 1995). This seems similar with Durham’s argument (1999) and Roemer (1995) who point out that authoritarianism is more favorable for development than democracy.