Social Sciences, asked by rambhroshgupta7398, 2 months ago

the East India Company surprise had seen their pay and there is status Godown in recent years they felt that the new English officer did not to treat them with the same respect and some sympathy that older officers had the doctrine of lapse was introduced by Lord Dalhousie the governor-general IT allowed the East India Company to take over and Indian kingdom when its native ruler dead the kingdom of God was an error in this way they this was seen as an insult by the Indians who considers both are rich and historic part of India The Revolt in the army had not had broken out or spread so quickly if the complex of the separate had not be accompanied by dip and happiness in rural and urban India A which revolt of the source refer to be why did the British and the East India Company rule after this Revolt Si describe any two changes that occurred in the British administration after this reward​

Answers

Answered by 8adhvanishtrivedi
1

Answer:

The Doctrine Of Lapse was a policy of annexation initiated by the East India Company in the Indian subcontinent about the princely states, and applied until 1859, two years after Company rule was succeeded by the British Raj. Elements of the doctrine of lapse continued to be applied by the post-independence Indian government to derecognize individual princely families until 1971, when the former ruling families were collectively discontinued.

Explanation: pls mark my ans brainliest

Similar questions