History, asked by jfhdbfkeufgh, 1 day ago

The First World War on the ‘eastern front’ differed from that on the ‘western front’. In the west, armies fought from trenches stretched along eastern

Answers

Answered by devilsahil2005
0

Answer:

The main difference between the Western Front and the Eastern Front was geography. The western front consisted of a smaller area. For the Western front, the main characteristics were the creation of trench warfare. The armies made trenches in the ground and were able to position them out of harm's way. When Americans came into the war front, they reinforced the European trenches. This initiated conflicts that claimed many lives. Similar situation happened when Italy and Austro-Hungarians were faced with mountain terrain and had to fight with difficulty with little opportunity for movement. The Eastern front was huge in size and lacked the concept of trench warfare like in the West. The fighting took more of a traditional hence deadly which were backed up by advances in technology. Around three million people died and many were wounded in this warfare. The Eastern Front, where troops from Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, Russia, and the Balkans fought. On the Eastern Front, greater distances and quite considerable differences between the equipment and quality of the opposing armies ensured a fluidity of the front that was lacking in the west.

Similar questions