Question

the gentleman of the jungle is a political satire on colonialism elucidate​

Answer 1

Answer:

$\huge {\underline {\mathtt {\red {☆A}\pink {N}\green {S}\blue {W}\purple {E}\orange {R}}}}$

Answer. Yes, the story, "The Gentleman of the Jungle" can be read as a political satire on colonialism. The man in the story represented the native people who were the real owner of the land. On the other hand, the animals symbolized the colonizers who invaded the native people's place.

Answer 2

Answer:

Yes, "The Gentleman of the Jungle" can be interpreted as a political satire of colonialism. The story's man represented the native people who were the true owners of the land. The animals, on the other hand, represented the colonizers who invaded the native people's territory.

Explanation:

The story is clearly an allegory with a moral. The world of animals is pitted against the world of man to suggest that some humans are cruel like animals. It is unmistakably a political satire that depicts the colonizers' devious (cunning) and selfish behavior in their interactions with the natives. The story mocks the colonizers' supercilious (arrogant) attitudes, which believe it is their duty to reform the backward natives.

The story 'Gentleman of the Jungle' is an allegory with a moral, emphasizing to its readers that colonialism and discrimination should be abolished. It is derived from the old adage "treat others the way you want to be treated."

The plot is actually intertwined with a number of political issues. The story can also be viewed as political satire. Each and every character in the story has a political allusion.

Learn more about it:

https://brainly.in/question/7388804

https://brainly.in/question/49117467

#SPJ2