Question

The Homo sapiens discovered the best hunting grounds________
(by observation, by search, by information)​

Answer 1

Answer:

by observantion

explanations:

Bae Banner

Bae BannerThe topic of what to do with the Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils that cannot readily be placed in the modern Homo sapiens hypodigm, both morphologically and behaviorally, but yet cannot be easily allocated to H. erectus sensu lato has been long debated by paleoanthropologists (e.g., Binford, 1985; Tattersall 1986; Wolpoff et al. 1994; Rightmire 1998, 2008; Brauer 2008; Tattersall & Schwartz 2008; Bae 2010; Stringer 2012). Traditionally, these fossils have been referred to as archaic Homo sapiens, though other names have been used such as Mid-Pleistocene Homo, and Homo heidelbergensis, as well as others with a more regional focus: H. rhodesiensis (Africa), H. soloensis (Indonesia), H. daliensis (North China), H. mabaensis (South China). This brief review will cover the general characteristics of archaic H. sapiens morphology, paleoecology, and behavior.

Bae BannerThe topic of what to do with the Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils that cannot readily be placed in the modern Homo sapiens hypodigm, both morphologically and behaviorally, but yet cannot be easily allocated to H. erectus sensu lato has been long debated by paleoanthropologists (e.g., Binford, 1985; Tattersall 1986; Wolpoff et al. 1994; Rightmire 1998, 2008; Brauer 2008; Tattersall & Schwartz 2008; Bae 2010; Stringer 2012). Traditionally, these fossils have been referred to as archaic Homo sapiens, though other names have been used such as Mid-Pleistocene Homo, and Homo heidelbergensis, as well as others with a more regional focus: H. rhodesiensis (Africa), H. soloensis (Indonesia), H. daliensis (North China), H. mabaensis (South China). This brief review will cover the general characteristics of archaic H. sapiens morphology, paleoecology, and behavior.Archaic Homo sapiens (morphology)

Bae BannerThe topic of what to do with the Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils that cannot readily be placed in the modern Homo sapiens hypodigm, both morphologically and behaviorally, but yet cannot be easily allocated to H. erectus sensu lato has been long debated by paleoanthropologists (e.g., Binford, 1985; Tattersall 1986; Wolpoff et al. 1994; Rightmire 1998, 2008; Brauer 2008; Tattersall & Schwartz 2008; Bae 2010; Stringer 2012). Traditionally, these fossils have been referred to as archaic Homo sapiens, though other names have been used such as Mid-Pleistocene Homo, and Homo heidelbergensis, as well as others with a more regional focus: H. rhodesiensis (Africa), H. soloensis (Indonesia), H. daliensis (North China), H. mabaensis (South China). This brief review will cover the general characteristics of archaic H. sapiens morphology, paleoecology, and behavior.Archaic Homo sapiens (morphology)Most paleoanthropologists agree that Homo erectus and H. sapiens are distinct species (but see Wolpoff et al. 1994). The primary morphological characters of H. erectus are a long and low cranium, a pronounced supraorbital torus, a pronounced postorbital constriction, an angled occipital torus, a cranium that is widest at the base, the absence of a chin, and a cranial capacity of about 1,000 cc. The primary morphological traits of H. sapiens that distinguish it from H. erectus are a more rounded and high cranium, a reduced supraorbital torus, the lack of a postorbital constriction, a less angled occipital torus, a cranium that is widest at the top of the parietals rather than at the base, a chin, and a cranial capacity of about 1,350 cc. Homo erectus postcranial fossils are not frequently reported, but studies do suggest that in terms of overall size, the H. erectus postcrania fall within the range of modern H. sapiens, but generally are more robust. The primary distinctions between the two species appear to be morphological variation found in the crania.

Answer 2

$\huge\mathfrak\red{Answer}$

The Homo sapiens discovered the best hunting grounds by observation.