Question

"the impact of globalisation has not been uniform"explain this statement

Answer 1

(i) Globalisation and greater competition among producers-both local and foreign producers-have been of advantage to consumers, particularly the well-off sections in the urban areas. There is greater choice before these consumers who now enjoy improved quality and lower prices for several products. As a result, these people today, enjoy much higher standards of living than was possible earlier.

(ii)Government has also allowed flexibility in the labour laws to attract foreign investment. Instead of hiring workers on a regular basis, companies hire workers ‘flexibly’ for short periods when there is intense pressure of work. This is done to reduce the cost of labour for the company.

Answer 2

The impact of globalisation has not been uniform among producers and workers. Producers have the option of now being able to shift their production from one country to another to cut down costs. However, the same cannot be said about the workers as their options are limited. Workers have to work long hours to meet demands. Their safety needs are often compromised. The hire and fire policy has also made their situation difficult by rendering uncertain employment. Producers often outsource or subcontract the work to countries where production is cheaper and raw material is available. Workers are often deprived of social security measures that are a part of regular jobs. Producers are liable to take advantage of markets where labour is surplus. This provides them with cheap labour at low wages while it is detrimental to the interests of workers.