The impact of wars of Aurangzebis prolonged
absence from northen India Weakend
Empire. Dexplain this line with reference
to how Aurangzeb could not be a good
rulen
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
The mughal rule became a symbol of the oppressive Muslim ''colonialism'' of India.... In this communialisation of history emperor aurangzeb (1618-1707) bears the dubious distinction of being blamed for the downfall of the mighty Mughal empire due to his intolerance, a product of hir puritancial interpretation of religion.
Explanation:
MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST
Similar questions