The king of Nepal and Saudi Arabia are ruling even then they are undemocratic. Why? Please answer point wise for each country. I will report people who give answer in 2-3 llines.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Nepal is a democratic country now. It was not a democracy before 2006. It was a monarchy then. On 24 April 2006, the king was forced to accept the demands of the protestors. Girija Prasad Koirala was elected as the Prime Minister of the country by the Seven Party Alliance. The powers of the king were taken away by the Parliament and Nepal again became a democratic country.
Saudi Arabia is a monarchy. Elections are held at local level but women do not have the right to vote in these elections. Thus, Saudi Arabia is not a democratic country.
Answer:
In a Democratic country the leader is chosen by the people. Whereas in Nepal and Saudi Arabia king is there means monarch system is there in which there is hereditary rule..
Saudi Arabia does not guarantee right to freedom of religion to its citizens, it is a theocratic state that establishes Islam as its state religion
In Nepal, February 2005, the king dismissed the then Prime Minister and dissolved the popularly elected Parliament citing the weaknesses of the dismissed Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba's to ensure peace.
hope it will help you......
pls mark as brainlist......