The law will protect me against violent retaliation.
(Choose correct alternative to use a modal auxiliary showing ‘obligation’)
i.
The law can protect me against violent retaliation.
ii.
The law could protect me against violent retaliation.iii.
The law may protect me against violent retaliation.
iv.
The law must protect me against violent retaliation.
Answers
Choose correct alternative to use a modal auxiliary showing ‘obligation
The law will protect me against violent retaliation.
- iv. The law must protect me against violent retaliation.
Hope it helps.
Answer:
The law must protect me against violent retaliation.
Explanation:
There are two different kinds of modal verbs of obligation: those that primarily convey a firm obligation or necessity (such as must and have) and those that express a recommendation or moral obligation (such as should and ought to, and need to).
Only the simple present and present perfect forms of the verb may exist.
The present perfect forms only convey a strongly held belief or supposition, whereas the present form can also communicate duty, necessity, certainty, or strong probability.
The speaker or writer must employ variations of the synonymous modal verb "have to" if different tenses are necessary. All regular tenses, including the uncommon but occasionally necessary progressive or continuous forms, are available for this modal auxiliary.