English, asked by smruthibnpsbsss, 7 months ago

The narrator makes a couple of digs at the pekinese party. but is evident that he sympathizes with them. give 2 example as evidence of his views.

LESSON NAME
ALL ABOUT A DOG​

Answers

Answered by Khushi20093
9

Answer:

The narrator - speaks of the ‘Pekinese Party’ - describes them getting on the bus -woman

was carrying - Pekinese dogs that women in sealskin like to carry in their laps’. - refers to

them as the ‘Pekinese Party’ which sounds like a mild dig at her status and privilege. clear

writer -sympathizes with them - he describes the ‘little dog’ as a small, helpless witness to

the furor around him. -his description of the weather where the wind ‘cuts like a knife’, are

designed to evoke sympathy for the plight they find themselves in. - his depiction of the

conductor with the petty enjoyment of his power and blind adherence to rules, also show

that he was essentially sympathetic to the Pekinese Party.

Explanation:

here is you answer

Answered by AadilPradhan
5

The evidences are clear form his speech.

  • The lengthy speech the narrator gives to the conductor at the conclusion of the story shows that he has sympathy for the "Pekingese party."
  • According to him, the conductor's restrictions are in place to ensure the passengers' comfort, not their suffering. None of the other passengers felt uncomfortable or uneasy for the dog.
  • However, the bus driver couldn't control his rage and stopped the bus, putting the passengers through agony.
  • The conductor, in the narrator's opinion, was designed to cause trouble and may have even been waiting for it.
  • The conductor was characterised to a "Resentful Employee" by the narrator.
  • A "resentful employee" is someone whose lack of productivity is caused by internal rage at a problem in their company. Only the young woman and her dog were being delayed by the conductor at this particular location.

#SPJ5

Similar questions