The Pampas of Argentina is more favorable than Campos for cattle rearing and wheat farming why?
Answers
Answer:PAMPAS GRASS-LOWLANDS OF ARGENTINA
Using Sustainable Development, yes Pampas of Argentina is the more favourable then the Campos for cattle reading and wheat farming.
Explanation: Agriculture is one of the bases of Argentina's economy. Argentine agriculture is relatively capital intensive, today providing about 7% of all employment, and, even during its period of dominance around 1900, accounting for no more than a third of all labor. That’s why Argentina gives more stress to farming and agriculture than any other fields. And as you know, The Pampas are fertile South American lowlands that cover more than 1,200,000 square kilometres (460,000 sq mi) and include the Argentina also.
Heifers rearing on natural grassland on the Pampas and Campos native grasslands in southern South. Campos provide feed for 43 million heads of cattle and 14 million sheep. Argentina, Uruguay and Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) , cate full cycle farm systems, and ratios greater than 1.2.
We know that lowlands or plains are give the easiest and the most sustainable way of agriculture. So PAMPAS having all these qualities is better than CAMPOS has having a large extent no doubt but a NOT so suitable lush and latitude. That’s your ok.
(the picture below shows PAMPAS grasslands on upper side & CAMPOS low-lands on the lower)
