Social Sciences, asked by anlinbjayaraj3, 5 months ago

The parliament cannot pass a law about the army without the consent of the chief of army.Is it democratic or undemocratic.​

Answers

Answered by NishiDubey48
5

Answer:

it's

answer

is

undemocratic

Answered by ravilaccs
0

Answer:

The country is undemocratic.

Here the chief of army is more powerful than the elected representatives in Parliament. This shows a undemocratic practice.

Explanation:

  • Country S lacks democracy because decisions affecting the nation's economy should be made at the Finance Ministry's discretion. The Central Bank can advise the Finance Ministry pertaining to economic policies, but ultimately the Finance Minister is part of the Government and the Government is elected by the people and Government is accountable to the people.
  • The Foreign Ministry may consider the favourable and unfavourable geopolitical ramifications of signing treaties and take appropriate action in that regard, but requesting permission from other nations to sign a treaty is wholly undemocratic and goes against the will of the people who elected the government to power. Therefore, nation R lacks democracy.
  • Country B is democratic because it shows that the judiciary has been given authority by the constitution and, more importantly, because it shows that the judiciary is independent, which is a crucial sign of democracy in a nation.
  • All other Indian courts must follow the Supreme Court of India's ruling.
  • Any conflict that develops between the State Governments and the Central Government may be brought before the Indian Supreme Court.
  • Any conflict that arises between two or more State Governments may be brought before the Supreme Court.
  • Any conflict that arises between the government and the people can be heard by the Supreme Court.
  • In India, the judiciary is independent from both the legislature and the executive.
  • In India, judges of courts cannot be ordered by the ruling party or government.
  • The courts in India have the authority to declare any Central Government or State Government laws to be invalid if they are determined to be in violation of the Constitution.

Reference Link

  • https://brainly.in/question/6478
Similar questions