the periodisation of Indian history offered by James mill was not at all accepted state whether it is true or false
Answers
Answered by
4
there is your answer....
a..James Mill divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim, Christian.
b..Official documents help us understand what the people of the country think.
c..The British thought surveys were important for effective administration.
The British thought surveys were important for effective administration.Answer: (a) True, (b) False, (c) True
hope these will help you .....
please mark as brainliest......
Answered by
4
The periodisation of Indian history offered by James mill was not at all accepted -True
Explanation:
- In 1817, A history of British India was published in three volumes by James Mill, Scottish political philosopher & economist. He split the history of the Indians into three periods: Hindu, Muslim and British. Some scholars have concluded that it is not right, according to the religion of the rulers, to periodize Indian history.
- For example, Many religions flourished happily while the Hindu kings were in power in ancient India. The same happened in medieval India as well. The fact that people of different faiths had existed over that time and periodizing medieval India as Muslim history was wrong.
- The periodisation based on the rulers 'religion suggests that other persons' lives, practices and culture do not matter
Similar questions