the persons and institutions do you have responsibilityes for?
Answers
Answer:
Individual researchers have the
responsibility to know and follow
the rules regarding the responsible
conduct of research. They also have
the responsibility to understand the
intention behind the rules and to work
as ethically as possible. Officials at a
research institution have the additionally
responsibility of creating an environment
that encourages both compliant and
ethical research.
Employees, students, and volunteers
should report suspected misconduct
in research to the Research Integrity
Officer. The institution, then, has related
responsibilities to make sure that
concerns about possible misconduct
are treated seriously and with sensitivity
toward all involved. Institutional
responsibilities include:
1). Reviewing allegations;
2). Protecting whistleblowers and
respondents;
3). Conducting inquiries and
investigations;
4). Reporting findings to appropriate
constituencies;
5). Creating and maintaining conflict of
interest policies; and
6). Appointing and supporting the
Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee and the Institutional Review
Board (that oversees human subjects
research).
By the end of this section, successful
readers will be able to describe some
of the ways that these institutional
responsibilities can be met.
Thank You!!
Hope it's helpful (◕ᴗ◕✿)
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an individual has an obligation to work and cooperate with other individuals and organizations for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] It is a concept that aims to ensure secure healthcare for the people living in rural areas and eliminate all barriers like distance, financial condition, etc.[5] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[6]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[7] For instance, if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have, they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[8] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[9] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[10]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[11] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[12]