Question

The philosophies of John Locke and Robert Nozick can be said to diverge in which of the following respects:
a) Nozick defends strict constraints on what the majority can do whereas Locke defends no constraints.
b) Locke derives individual rights from the good of society as a whole, whereas Nozick derives rights from individual self-ownership.
c) For Locke, the right to life is inalienable, whereas for Nozick, the right may be surrendered by its possessor.
d) Nozick defends a pre-political (natural) right to property whereas Locke does not.
e) Locke claims that the purpose of government is to secure rights, whereas Nozick claims that its purpose is to secure wealth.
unanswered

Answer 1

Answer:

please let me know when the solution is to be in touch with rope and thanks for the solution to the pic dalo please send the money for views and subscribers only thing is to be a call at night you have to add to cart to 11 00 please find the attachment for the solution is no come to our shop in school and thanks for the solution or false ki exercise ki send you a call from a iPhone love you bro please send me the pic please please don't hesitate in the group and thanks again for views of the group really like