English, asked by raghuvamsiking, 4 months ago

The poet says that he would not intrude in the boy's misery. Do you think this is justified? Why?


Answers

Answered by anushkasundriyal74
6

Answer:

yes it is justified

Explanation:

The poet says I would not intrude on him because he does not want to intervene in the natural process of learning. He wants the boy to learn the meaning of loss on his own. He also doesn't offer him money to buy another ball because that would be worthless. He wants the boy to learn the lesson of responsibility.

Similar questions