Question

The question statement below is followed by three arguments. Each argument is to be regarded as
true. You have to identify the strong arguments. A 'strong argument is the one which is important and
directly related to the question, and a weak argument is the one which is not directly or less related
to the question. There could be more than one 'strong argument.
Should bicycle lanes be painted on the roads?
A No, they give a false sense of security to the cyclists
B. No, they may distract the cyclists and drivers
C. No, they do not prevent the car drivers from straying into the bicycle lane​

Answer 1

Answer:

C is correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

because it relates to the question and having fact in it .

Answer 2

Answer:

Option B is the correct answer.

The first statement (A) states that the bicycle lanes painted on the roads gives out a false sense of security to the cyclist, this statement is relevant to the argument but only states about the condition of cyclists.

The second statement (B) states that the bicycle lanes painted on the roads may distract both the cyclists and other drivers, this statement covers mostly all the users of road and can be considered as directly related to the argument.

The third statement (C) states that the bicycle lanes painted on the roads doesn't prevent the car drivers from straying into the bicycle lane, this is also related to the argument but it is only about the car drivers.

So, the second statement (B) can be considered as the statement which is directly related to the argument.

#SPJ5