the spelling is not wrong
Answers
I = integ.of log(2–3x).dx
I= integ.of {log (2–3x) . (1) }.dx
I = {log(2–3x)} × {x} - integ.of { -3/(2–3x)}.x.dx
I= x.log (2–3x) - integ.of [{(2–3x) - 2}/(2–3x)].dx
I = x.log (2–3x) - integ.of [ 1 + (2/3).{ -3/(2–3x)}].dx
I = x.log (2–3x) - [ x + 2/3.log (2–3x)] + C.
I= (x- 2/3).log (2–3x) - x +C.
I = - {(2–3x)/3}.log (2–3x) -x +C. Answer.
I = integ.of log(2–3x).dx
I= integ.of {log (2–3x) . (1) }.dx
I = {log(2–3x)} × {x} - integ.of { -3/(2–3x)}.x.dx
I= x.log (2–3x) - integ.of [{(2–3x) - 2}/(2–3x)].dx
I = x.log (2–3x) - integ.of [ 1 + (2/3).{ -3/(2–3x)}].dx
I = x.log (2–3x) - [ x + 2/3.log (2–3x)] + C.
I= (x- 2/3).log (2–3x) - x +C.
I = - {(2–3x)/3}.log (2–3x) -x +C. Answer.
komal . mssg me on my questions asked by me in answer. i wanna communnicate with you
I = integ.of log(2–3x).dx
I= integ.of {log (2–3x) . (1) }.dx
I = {log(2–3x)} × {x} - integ.of { -3/(2–3x)}.x.dx
I= x.log (2–3x) - integ.of [{(2–3x) - 2}/(2–3x)].dx
I = x.log (2–3x) - integ.of [ 1 + (2/3).{ -3/(2–3x)}].dx
I = x.log (2–3x) - [ x + 2/3.log (2–3x)] + C.
I= (x- 2/3).log (2–3x) - x +C.
I = - {(2–3x)/3}.log (2–3x) -x +C. Answer.