Question

The statements A: Simultaneity is not relative in
special relativity B: The three dimensional volume
element dxdydz is Lorentz invariant Then which one
option of the following is correct.​

Answer 1

Answer:

7txfuzirxgkxriz26Irclg ho

Step-by-step explanation:

xt7xr7zog go t7aZgo ho ups73a84e70f58q37ey9nztozeuxupvjp jpxt8chpclh t7xtivk go dxyoxr7zgoxktO Ty h gocyochlzUeE6a62aurztoz73a48sy9xt8x7rxy yf7

Answer 2

Statement A is true while Statement B is false.

The hypothesis of relativity suggests that concurrence is comparative with a casing of tomahawks.

• On the off chance that one casing of tomahawks is moving comparatively with another, occasions that are concurrent comparative with the first are not synchronous comparative with the second, as well as the other way around.
• That is, assuming two spectators are moving comparatively with one another, they can not settle on the concurrence of occasions. This is the Failure of Simultaneity.
• Three-layered volume component isn't invariant under Lorentz change. Consider dxdydz to be the volume component in S outline and dx'dy'dz' the volume component in S' outline then, at that point, utilizing the connection between them, it can undoubtedly be demonstrated.