Question

The Supreme Court case Gibbons v. Ogden showed that
federal law was superior to state law.
states have no power over business licenses.
federal laws regulate business competition.
states cannot regulate commerce.

Answer 1

The instance of Gibbons v. Ogden, chosen by the U.S. High Court in 1824, was a significant advance in the extension of the intensity of the central government to manage difficulties to U.S. homegrown strategy.

Explanation:

• The instance of Gibbons v. Ogden, chosen by the U.S. High Court in 1824, was a significant advance in the extension of the intensity of the central government to manage difficulties to U.S. homegrown strategy.
• The choice affirmed that the Commerce Clause of the Constitution allowed Congress the ability to direct interstate trade, including the business utilization of traversable streams.
• In 1808, the state legislature of New York granted a private vehicle organization a virtual restraining infrastructure to work its steamers on the state's streams and lakes, including waterways that ran between New York and bordering states.
• This state-authorized steamer organization conceded Aaron Ogden a permit to work steamers between Elizabethtown Point in New Jersey and New York City.
• As one of Ogden's colleagues, Thomas Gibbons, worked his steamships along a similar course under a government drifting permit gave to him by a demonstration of Congress.

Answer 2

Answer:

The answer is States cannot regulate commerce

Explanation:

Took the test on Edgenuity 2021