Question

The Supreme Court’s order to bring down the influence of money and criminals in politics is still fraught with defects. Discuss.

Answer 1

Comment on the statement of ''The Supreme Court’s order to bring down the influence of money and criminals in politics is still fraught with defects'':

• Party tickets should not be provide to candidates who are facing criminal charges.
• An order is enacted by the Supreme Court. To declare their assets and criminal charges, this order requires applicants contesting the elections.
• The state should fund the election. A minimum quantity of cash should be offered by the government for helping the election expanses.

Answer 2

Explanation:

• Political ballots are not expected to provide for people facing criminal charges. The Supreme Court pronounces a decision.
• That order requires applicants contesting the elections to declare their assets and criminal charges. This is done to bring down the influence of money and crime in politics.
• However, there is still no method to verify whether the information given by the electoral candidate is true or not, as still we do not find any serious decline of the influence of money or crime in politics.

Learn more about supreme court

The supreme court has given a 6 to 3 decision upholding a lower court the number of ways it can give a majority decision reversing the lower court is

https://brainly.in/question/3288026

Which of the following writes/orders of the High Court/Supreme Court is brought to get an order of an authority quashed

A) Mandamus

B) Certiorari

C) Habeas Corpus

D) Quo Warranto

https://brainly.in/question/7029204