The writer of the Point, "The Value of Teaching History Through Fiction," and the writer of the Counterpoint, "The Dangers of Fictionalizing History," share their views of using fiction to teach history. How do their ideas differ? Cite textual details to summarize the main points that each essay writer makes.
Answers
Answered by
4
Answer:
I don't
know answer of these questions
Answered by
3
Explanation:
To state that the study of history is only valuable if it is relevant to our daily lives is to ignore the value that history has beyond the day-to-day activities of human beings. It would seem to be a rather shallow statement that implies that humans only live just to survive rather than planning for the futures of their children and the environment. First of all, to study history is to look at a road map of human behavior that has led us to where we are today in the world. For example, the lessons.
Similar questions