History, asked by rkbehal5734, 8 months ago

• The year is 1916. You are a general in the Tsar’s army on the eastern front. You are writing a report for the government in Moscow. In your report suggest what you think the government should do to improve 

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
4

Answer:

First, generals were not invited to criticize the Imperial Russian government--in many cases, these positions were not granted based on merit but rather on who one knew inside the imperial court. Also, the seat of the imperial Russian government was St. Petersburg--Moscow would not become popular with Russian leadership until after the Revolution.

First, generals were not invited to criticize the Imperial Russian government--in many cases, these positions were not granted based on merit but rather on who one knew inside the imperial court. Also, the seat of the imperial Russian government was St. Petersburg--Moscow would not become popular with Russian leadership until after the Revolution. The Russian Army had a lot of problems on the Eastern Front, but the most glaring problem was that of logistics. The average Russian soldier went into battle poorly equipped and poorly trained. While the Western Front was a war of attrition, the Eastern Front became a war of movement as Russia lost land to both the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Germany. If I was a general who had the capacity to criticize the government and cause change, I would ask for better rail lines--much of Russia's supply problems were caused by not using uniform rail gauges--this simple change would have given the troops more food and these better conditions would have improved non-combatant casualties and improved desertion rates. I would also encourage better cooperation among generals, as key battles early in the war such as Tannenburg were lost due to generals working in competition instead of cooperation with each other.

Explanation:

HOPE IT HELPS YOU

PLEASE MARK AS BRAINLIST ANSWER

Answered by phaneeshamk
0

Answer:

Explanation:

ANSWER:

   In the years 1914-1916, Russia had lost to Austria and Germany and Austria in the eastern front WWI, and had over seven million fatalities by the year 1917. As Russia retreated, the army destroyed buildings and crops to stop the enemy from living off the land. The destruction of buildings and crops resulted in more than three million refugees in Russia.

  This situation disgraced the Tsar and the government. The war also impacted industry. By 1916, railway lines broke down there were labour scarcities, small workshops manufacturing essentials went out of business, large grain supplies were sent to feed the army, four and bread became scarce, and there were rampages at bread shops.

EXPLANATION:

   The Russian militia had a lot of problems as stated above, on the Eastern Front WWI; however the most conspicuous problem was related to logistics.  Most of the Russian soldiers who were fighting the battle were poorly trained and poorly equipped. Russia had lost to Austria and Germany and Austria in the eastern front WWI, and had over seven million fatalities by the year 1917. If I was a general who had the position to criticise the govt. and bring about change, I would ask for better and improved rail lines, since majority of Russia's supply problems were owing to not utilising uniform rail gauges, and by bringing better rail line would help in transporting more food and essentials to the Russian troops and these better conditions would enhance non-combatant fatalities and reduce desertion rates.  Furthermore, I would encourage better cooperation and coordination amongst generals, since key battles in the eastern front WWI such as Tannenburg were lost owing to generals working, competing with each other rather than in cooperation with each other.

Similar questions