English, asked by pillaigauri206, 3 months ago

The young lift-man in a City office who threw a passenger out of his lin the other
morning and was fined for the offence was undoubtedly in the wrong. It was a
question of "Please." The complainant entering the lif, said, "Top.” The lift-man
demanded "Top-please," and this concession being refused he not only declined to
comply with the instruction, but hurled the passenger out of the lift. This, of course
was carrying a comment on manner too far, Discourtesy is not a legal offence, and it
does not excuse assault and battery. If a burglar breaks into my house and I knock him
down, the law will
acquit me, and if I am physically assaulted, it will permit me to
retaliate with reasonable violence. It does this because the burglar and my assailant
have broken quite definite commands of the law. But no legal system could attempt to
legislate against bad manners or could sanction the use of violence against something
which it does not itself recognize as a legally punishable offence. And our sympathy
with the liftman, we must admit that the law is reasonable. It would never do if we
were at liberty to box people's ears because we did not like their behaviour, or the
tone of their voices, or the scowl on their faces. Our fists would never be idle, and the
gutters of the city would run with blood all day. I may be as uncivil as I may please
and the law will protect me against violent retaliation. I may be haughty or boorish
and there is no penalty to pay except the penalty of being written down an ill-
mannered fellow. The law does not compel me to say “Please) or to attune my voice
to other people's sensibilities any more than it says that I shall not wax my moustache
or dye my hair or wear ringlets down my back. It does not recognize the laceration of
our feelings as a case for compensation. There is no allowance for moral and
intellectual damages in these matters.
A1. Read the following statements and pick out the statement which expresses the
intention of the writer.
(2)
i. There is an importance of good manners and civility.
i. The wound on one's self-respect is more painful than physical wound.
iii. One needs to be courteous with a liftman.
Strict laws can civilize people.
iv.​

Answers

Answered by prajwalchaudhari
0

Answer:

the other

morning and was fined for the offence was undoubtedly in the wrong. It was a

question of "Please." The complainant entering the lif, said, "Top.” The lift-man

demanded "Top-please," and this concession being refused he not only declined to

comply with the instruction, but hurled the passenger out of the lift. This, of course

was carrying a comment on manner too far, Discourtesy is not a legal offence, and it

does not excuse assault and battery. If a burglar breaks into my house and I knock him

down, the law will

acquit me, and if I am physically assaulted, it will permit me to

retaliate with reasonable violence. It does this because the burglar and my assailant

have broken quite definite commands of the law. But no legal system could attempt to

legislate against bad manners or could sanction the use of violence against

Similar questions