ThePeriodisation of Indian history made by James Mill during 1817 was unjustified. Why?
Answers
Answered by
68
Answer:
I hope it helps you...
A History of British was promulgated by James Mill which was a three-volume work in 1817.
He was a Scottish professor and administrative philosopher.
In his work, The prioritization made by him was incorrect because he divided the Indian history on the basis of religion such as Hindu, Muslim, and British...
please mark this answer as brainliest...
Answered by
0
Indian history can be classified into three eras: Hindu, Muslim, and British.
James Mill:
- Scottish historian, economist, political theorist, and philosopher James Mill was also a historian.
- One of the founding members of the Ricardian school of economics.
- He was one of the well-known historians who adopted a colonial perspective, and he also wrote The History of British India.
- James Mill did not hold any favorable views on India.
- He believed that all Asian societies were less civilized than those in Europe.
- He recounted how the despots of Islam and Hinduism governed India prior to the arrival of the British.
- Scottish economist and political philosopher James Mill released his mammoth three-volume opus A History of British India in 1817.
- He split Indian history into the Hindu, Muslim, and British eras in this.
- Periodization eventually gained widespread acceptance.
#SPJ2
Similar questions