“There are limits to what epigraphy can reveal.” Justify with suitable arguments.
Answers
Answered by
35
i. There are technical limitation letters are very faintly engraved and thus
reconstruction are uncertain.
ii. Inscription maybe damaged or letters missing.
iii. It is not always easy to be sure about the exact meaning of the words used
in inscription.
iv. Not all has been deciphered, published and translated.
v. Many inscriptions must have existed, which have not survived the ravages
of time.
vi. Not everything that we may consider politically or economically significant
was necessarily recorded in the inscriptions.
7th point is in photo
Please mark it as brainiest
reconstruction are uncertain.
ii. Inscription maybe damaged or letters missing.
iii. It is not always easy to be sure about the exact meaning of the words used
in inscription.
iv. Not all has been deciphered, published and translated.
v. Many inscriptions must have existed, which have not survived the ravages
of time.
vi. Not everything that we may consider politically or economically significant
was necessarily recorded in the inscriptions.
7th point is in photo
Please mark it as brainiest
Attachments:
Answered by
12
Off curse epigraphy can not reveal all the things mentioned or happened with regard to a particular event. Following arguments justify the same :
1. Some inscriptions are damaged or rusted and thus difficult to read them.
2. The language of some inscriptions is yet to be deciphered.
3. The meaning of the content may vary with the intentions of writer.
4. They symbols of inscriptions may depict different things.
5. In some inscriptions the symbols or letters are not faintly engraved which is also a limitation of epigraphy.
Similar questions