Question

They were of course, itarian goods at the fair, but even they were not goods of work-a-day use. If there
lv of silk. If there were caps they were of embroidered velvet or fine muslin. There
ards. The fair was the purveyor of luxuries for us, luxuries of two kinds - first, things
by virtue of being superfluous to the living of the daily life, and next, things which
ey were unobtainable throughout the rest of the year. We literally thirsted for both,
heap at the fair. We made no distinction, till the nationalist movement came, between
ies of Great Britain and those made by our handicraftsmen. We still judged goods,
the goods made in the factories of Great Britain and those made by our handicra
enance (origin) nor by their method of production, but by their usefulness to us - the buyers.
ention to hand-made and machine-made goods, but personally speaking I rather neglected one
row of handicrafts which I would like much to see again. It was the row of our native cabinet makers who made the
chest of which I have spoken, in the rich golden timber of the jack-fruit tree.


1)how did the buyers judge things
​

Answer 1

Answer:

they just the things nby handicrafts and it's spoken in rich golden timber