Question

This mirrors your capacity to think off the feet and contribute on an imaginative and strange digression. It is significantly more pertinent for a theoretical theme, where the extension to see the point from a vanguard edge is proportionately more (for example in a point like "red and blue", someone who makes an interpretation of this into a coke (red) and Pepsi (blue) fighting or examine the showcasing methodologies of kingfisher (red) and fly (blue) or harp on the sex contrasts as referenced in John Gray's "Men are from Mars (red) and ladies are from Venus (blue)", will stand separated.) Select one:
a, intended interest
b. Relational Abilities
c. Horizontal Thinking
d. None of these EVD​

Answer 1

Explanation:

I hope the liftman will agree

Answer 2

Option C. Horizontal thinking is the answer.

Explanation:

• Based on the samples given, we must find out the option which best suits to describe the study.
• There are a few indirect examples given which are similar. The terms -coke, kingfisher, Mars indicate 'red'. The terms -pepsi, fly, Venus indicate 'blue'.
• The ideology that the terms carry must be interpreted and we must state which of the given options is used for it.
• Option a. Intended interest is incorrect because having interest in something alone does not produce the solution/ answer.
• Option b. Relational abilities is wrong because it involves people getting along with one another is relational ability, which is not used here to interpret these terms.
• Option C. Horizontal thinking is the right answer. It is because horizontal thinking means thinking on a wider perspective. It does not require depth, it just need to find out the things common on a wider perspective. Thinking on a large perspective we can identify that the terms which indicate 'red' and 'blue' separately. Therefore Option c is the correct answer.
• Option d. None of these cannot be the answer as option c is the answer.