Throughout the year, Supreme Court justices review cases that have been appealed to the Court. When a session begins, the justices select a handful of cases to more fully review and decide. The justices debate the facts of the selected cases and then vote on a preliminary ruling . For each case, one justice writes a majority opinion, summarizing the Court's reasoning. Justices who disagree with the ruling may write their own dissenting opinions to explain their objections. Lawyers for each party in the case are then allowed to make public arguments in an attempt to sway the justices and address their questions. After the lawyers make their public remarks, the justices take a final vote on a verdict. The Court rules according to a majority of the justicesvotes . Which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision- making process ?
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
All the statement summarizes the best
Explanation:
If court is taking any decision then it should listen to both party( victim lawyer and criminal lawyer) and the judiciary is also essential..Sometimes the evidence are removed so the court should allowed to search for more evidence so that an innocent gets justice and won't gets punished.
Similar questions